Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. A Review of Machine Learning Models for Harmful Algal Bloom Monitoring in Freshwater SystemsPublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: Journal of Natural Resources and Agricultural Ecosystems. 1(2): 63-76. (doi: 10.13031/jnrae.15647) @2023Authors: Ibrahim Busari, Debabrata Sahoo, R. Daren Harmel, Brian E. Haggard Keywords: Cyanobacteria, Freshwater, Harmful algal blooms, Machine learning, Water quality. Highlights Machine Learning (ML) models are identified, reviewed, and analyzed for HAB predictions. Data preprocessing is vital for efficient ML model development. ML models for toxin production and monitoring are limited. Abstract. Harmful algal blooms (HABs) are detrimental to livestock, humans, pets, the environment, and the global economy, which calls for a robust approach to their management. While process-based models can inform practitioners about HAB enabling conditions, they have inherent limitations in accurately predicting harmful algal blooms. To address these limitations, Machine Learning (ML) models can potentially leverage large volumes of IoT data to aid in near real-time predictions. ML models have evolved as efficient tools for understanding patterns and relationships between water quality parameters and HAB expansion. This review describes ML models currently used for predicting and forecasting HABs in freshwater ecosystems and presents model structures and their application for predicting algal parameters and related toxins. The review revealed that regression trees, random forest, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) are the most frequently used models for HABs monitoring. This review shows ML models' prowess in identifying significant variables influencing algal growth, HAB drivers, and multistep HAB prediction. Hybrid models also improve the prediction of algal-related parameters through improved optimization techniques and variable selection algorithms. While ML models often focus on algal biomass prediction, few studies apply ML models for toxin monitoring and prediction. This limitation can be associated with a lack of high-frequency toxin datasets for model development, and exploring this domain is encouraged. This review serves as a guide for policymakers and researchers to implement ML models for HAB prediction and reveals the potential of ML models for decision support and early prediction for HAB management. (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|