Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

Evaluating Draft EPA Emissions Models for Laying Hen Facilities  Open Access

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Journal of the ASABE. 66(4): 851-863. (doi: 10.13031/ja.15237) @2023
Authors:   Yijie Xiong, Guoming Li, Brett C. Ramirez, Robert T. Burns, Richard S. Gates
Keywords:   Air quality, Ammonia, Egg production, Emission model, Hydrogen sulfide, Particulate matter, Poultry.

Highlights

Draft EPA emission models for laying hen facilities were systematically evaluated.

The models performed poorly on predicting the air pollutants when input variables were out of the NAEMS data range.

A key finding was the unanticipated sensitivity of the draft model outputs to bird inventory and climate zones.

Further revision and improvement may be necessary for draft models before they can be adopted by the egg industry.

Abstract. In August 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released draft models to estimate daily NH3, H2S, PM10, PM2.5, and TSP emissions from egg-layer houses (high-rise and manure-belt) and manure storage using inputs of daily mean ambient temperature, relative humidity (RH), and hen inventory. These models were developed from refined datasets generated by the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study fieldwork completed in 2009. Notably, they do not include data for cage-free housing. Currently, 66% of U.S. laying hens are housed in cages; thus, these models, if adopted, will have a substantial impact on the U.S. egg industry. This study evaluated the EPA draft models‘ robustness and assessed model outputs for egg production systems under differing climate scenarios. The EPA draft models distort emission factors for bird inventories to be lower or higher than those used to develop the models. With inventory held constant, the marginal influence of ambient temperature and RH on daily emissions varied substantially, with some values falling below the measurement detection threshold while others exceeding literature findings. For twelve representative U.S. locations representing differing climates, substantial differences in emission factors were found for bird inventories outside the range in the database. Annual emissions estimated from inventories used to develop the EPA models also varied by location. We conclude that the current draft EPA emission models cannot be used to the degree of precision that is suitable to apply to a wide range of layer facilities, particularly cage-free systems. Revisions are suggested to accommodate a greater range of climates, laying hen facility types, and inventories for practical emission estimations.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)