Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. Mechanized Harvest of Onions in South TexasPublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: 2022 ASABE Annual International Meeting 2200054.(doi:10.13031/aim.202200054)Authors: Stephen W Searcy, Subas Malla, Dante L Galeazzi Keywords: bruise, damage, harvest, mechanization, onion. In 2021, testing with the Univerco machines was conducted in two fields with different production systems and varieties. Although tested with a range od operating conditions, the Univerco system had an average bulb damage of 5.14% for lifting and for harvesting of 8.0%, meaning the harvester contributed approximately 3% to the total. The Top Air system was tested on Veronica variety in 2021 and 2022, plus Hellcat variety in 2022. Lifting of Veronica, showed bulb damage of 1% both years. Lifting of Hellcat in 2022 had higher damage levels (4.6 to 16.2%, 10..6% overall mean) and no clear trend with operating conditions. In 2022, Hellcat was harvested on two dates with six and twelve days of field curing after lifting. The average damaged mass was 3.4% after six days and 1.6% after 12 days. Impact testing of bruising of four varieties was included. Durometer firmness did not predict bruising severity for any of the varieties. (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|