Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. Evaluation of the Crush Protection Zone of Three Crush Protection DevicesPublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting 1901457.(doi:10.13031/aim.201901457)Authors: Farzaneh Khorsandi, Paul Ayers, Eric Fong Keywords: All-Terrain Vehicles, Crush Protection Device, Crush Protection Zone, Crush Protection Device, Safety. No study has measured the volume of CPZ for different designs of ATV and CPD. In this study, the shape and volume of rear and side CPZ of three designs of CPD (Quadbar, Lifeguard, and Air-Quad) installed on 13 models of ATV were measured. Results of this study showed that the installation of a CPD protects operator by increasing the CPZ volume compared to the baseline ATV in the event of a rollover accident. The AIR-Quad, Quadbar, and Lifeguard increase the rear CPZ volume with an average of 0.48 m3 (111% increase), 0.39 m3 (92% increase), and 0.15 m3 (35% increase), respectively, compared to the average CPZ of a baseline ATV which is 0.44 m3. Also, a CPD protects the operator by increasing the distance between the seat reference point and the ground surface, during a rollover accident. (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|