Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Analysis of Parameter Sensitivity and Identifiability of Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) for Dryland Sugarbeet Modeling
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Transactions of the ASABE. 60(6): 1995-2010. (doi: 10.13031/trans.12313) @2017
Authors: Mohammad J. Anar, Zhulu Lin, Liwang Ma, Patricia N. S. Bartling, Jasper M. Teboh, Michael Ostlie
Keywords: Biofuels, CERES, DSSAT, RZWQM, Sugarbeet.
Sugarbeet is being considered as one of the most viable feedstock alternatives to corn for biofuel production since herbicide-resistant energy beets were deregulated by the USDA in 2012. Growing sugarbeets for biofuel production may have significant impacts on soil health and water quality in the north-central regions of the U.S., where 50% of the nation‘s total sugarbeets were produced in 2015. Almost all the current sugarbeet models simulate only plant growth and yield but have no capability to simulate the effects of sugarbeet production on soil and water quality. The Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) is a widely used model that simulates crop yield, water flow, and transport of salts and nitrogen in crop fields. RZWQM is currently linked to 23 specific crop models in the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) version 4.0, not including a sugarbeet model. In this study, the Crop and Environment REsource Synthesis (CERES) in RZWQM was adapted for sugarbeet simulation to model the soil and water quality impact of sugarbeet for biofuel production. The Beet model was then evaluated against dryland sugarbeet production at the Carrington Research and Extension Station (North Dakota) in 2014 and 2015. The PEST (Parameter ESTimation) tool in RZWQM was used for parameter estimation and sensitivity and identifiability analysis. The model did reasonably well in both 2014 (d-statistic = 0.709 to 0.992; rRMSE = 0.066 to 1.211) and 2015 (d-statistic = 0.733 to 0.990; rRMSE = 0.043 to 0.930) in terms of simulating leaf area index, top weight, root weight, soil water content, and soil nitrates. Under dry conditions, the most sensitive soil parameters were soil bulk densities and saturated hydraulic conductivities in different layers. Identifiability analysis also showed that three to five model parameters may be identifiable by calibration datasets. RZWQM enhanced with a sugarbeet module and its parameter analysis can be used for water use optimization under dryland conditions.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)