Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. Development and evaluation of an evaporation model for predicting sprinkler interval timePublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: 2017 ASABE Annual International Meeting 1700379.(doi:10.13031/aim.201700379)Authors: Brett C. Ramirez, Steven J. Hoff, Jay D. Harmon, John F. Patience Keywords: Cooling, Heat stress, Precision livestock farming, Swine, Ventilation Abstract. Heat stress in swine causes decreased productivity and economic losses; hence, heat stress mitigation techniques must be developed to be economically and resource efficient. Current cooling strategies for livestock facilities, such as evaporative coolers or sprinklers, are governed by the Water Vapor Pressure (WVP) concentration gradient between the air (a function of dry-bulb temperature; tdb, Relative Humidity; RH, and atmospheric pressure) and the saturated WVP at the wet surface. Traditional sprinkler control systems operate at fixed ‘off‘ intervals (i.e., drying) regardless if the thermal environment (TE) has the capacity or not to evaporate the dispersed water. Therefore, the objectives were to develop and simulate a novel Variable Interval Sprinkler Control System (VISCoS) that dynamically changes the ‘off‘ interval based on tdb, RH, and airspeed feedback. A theoretical simplified pig evaporation model estimated water evaporation rate as a function of the TE, pig surface area and skin temperature, and mass of water applied. To evaluate the model in controlled conditions, a cylinder (assumed geometry of a pig) was placed inside an insulated enclosure where different combinations of tdb, RH, and airspeed could be simulated across the cylinder. The inside surface of the cylinder was heated and controlled to replicate the skin temperature of an animal, while the outer surface was wrapped in a thin chamois. Water was applied to the cylinder via a sprinkler where approximately 40% of the top portion of the cylinder was wetted. Comparison of modeled with measured evaporation time showed reasonable agreement with a root-mean-square error of 7.9 min for evaporation times ranging from 5 to 25 min. (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|