Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. Influencing Factors on Infield Path Planning of different Farm TypesPublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: 2017 ASABE Annual International Meeting 1700105.(doi:10.13031/aim.201700105)Authors: Michael Mederle, Heinz Bernhardt Keywords: Automatic guidance, Autonomous navigation, Farm management, Optimization, Decision making. Preliminary studies in Germany and North America show that there are reasons why farmers often do not apply the infield strategy suggested by mathematical route planning tools. This study focuses on these influencing factors by expert interviews to make the computational optimization more useful and practice-oriented for farmers. Some concrete examples for influencing factors on infield logistics are direction giving obstacles, such as natural hedges or power lines, as well as the cultivation of row crops like corn, soybeans or sugar beets with all their particularities concerning the cultivation system. Furthermore, several machines working in the same field simultaneously influence each other, regardless whether or not they are of the equal type. Especially regarding the management of process chains, entire machine fleets or even autonomous vehicle control, these decision criteria provide valuable knowledge to be embedded in infield optimization tools. (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|