Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

Robotic 3D Plant Perception and Leaf Probing with Collision-Free Motion Planning for Automated Indoor Plant Phenotyping

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  2017 ASABE Annual International Meeting  1700369.(doi:10.13031/aim.201700369)
Authors:   Yin Bao, Lie Tang, Dylan Shah
Keywords:   3D perception, high-throughput, motion planning, plant phenotyping, robotic leaf probing.

Abstract. Various instrumentation devices for plant physiology study such as chlorophyll fluorimeter and Raman spectrometer require leaf probing with accurate probe positioning and orientation with respect to leaf surface. In this work, we aimed to automate this process with a Kinect V2 sensor, a high-precision 2D laser profilometer, and a 6-axis robotic manipulator in a high-throughput manner. The relatively wide field of view and high resolution of Kinect V2 allowed rapid capture of the full 3D environment in front of the robot. Given the number of plants, the location and size of each plant were estimated by K-means clustering. A real-time collision-free motion planning framework based on Probabilistic Roadmap was adopted to maneuver the robotic manipulator without colliding with the plants. Each plant was scanned from top with the short-range profilometer to obtain a high-precision point cloud where potential leaf clusters were extracted by region growing segmentation. Each leaf segment was further partitioned into small patches by Voxel Cloud Connectivity Segmentation. Only the small patches with low root mean square values of plane fitting were used to compute probing poses. To evaluate probing accuracy, a square surface was scanned at various angles and its centroid was probed perpendicularly with a probing position error of 1.5 mm and a probing angle error of 0.84 degrees on average. Our growth chamber leaf probing experiment showed that the average motion planning time was 0.4 seconds and the average traveled distance of tool center point was 1 meter.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)