Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Minnesota Drainage: Completing Watershed Projects Through Agency and Advocacy Group Cooperation
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: 2016 10th International Drainage Symposium Conference, 6-9 September 2016, Minneapolis, Minnesota .(doi:10.13031/IDS.20162492909)
Authors: Craig Austinson
Keywords: Agriculture, best management practices, ditch, drainage, drainage authority, cooperation, nutrients, peak flows, quality, storage, total suspended solids, water quality
Currently, there is a push for the treatment of waters as part of a public drainage project. Adding practices to reduce peak flows or to improve water quality is not a simple process. Minnesota drainage law was originally written to promote the drainage of wetlands. Before a drainage project can be approved the petitioners must prove it is economically feasible. Correcting misunderstandings regarding the restrictions of drainage law is often a major part of conversations with agency personnel and those representing advocacy groups.
Blue Earth County has had some success incorporating treatment practices into our improvement and repair projects. Using examples from past projects, we will discuss how we resolved or avoided conflicts enabling projects to move forward. Attendees will be able to take these lessons learned and apply them to many of their own projects.
(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)