ASABE Technical Library - Abstract
Member and Access Notice
Biomass Bale Stack Location for Efficient Infield Logistics
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org
Citation: 2016 ASABE Annual International Meeting 162461747.(doi:10.13031/aim.20162461747)Authors: Subhashree Navaneetha Srinivasagan, Igathinathane Cannayen, Ganesh C Bora
Keywords: Aggregation, Biomass, Energy, Logistics, Optimization.
Abstract. Biomass bales after formation were scattered on the field and producers often aggregate them into stacks before transporting these bales to an outlet for consumption or delivery to industrial applications. Efficiency improvement in this infield bale logistics, such as finding optimum location for the bale stacks, will be beneficial. To address this an R simulation program involving five methods (field middle, middle data range, centroid, geometric median, and medoid) for field stack location and a direct aggregation to the outlet named “origin” were developed. These methods were evaluated against field areas for infield bale logistics distances (aggregation, transport, and total). Aggregation assumed using a single bale handling tractor and transport using a trailer/wagon handling 6-bales/trip. Results indicated for aggregation that geometric median was the best, followed by field middle or centroid, middle data range, medoid, and finally origin. Methods aggregation were about 76% and transport about 24% of the total (for >2 ha); and total distance were about 65% of the origin. ANOVA, excluding origin. Even though ANOVA indicated that several areas (≤11.8%) produced significant differences among the methods (p < 0.05) for the areas studied (0.5 to 520 ha), aggregation and total logistics excluding origin for the 6-bales/trip transport were not different. The field middle method was recommended as an easy and practical, and a power model described well (R2 > 0.99) its logistics distances.
(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)