Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Development of a Selective Automated Blossom Thinning System for Peaches
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Transactions of the ASABE. 58(6): 1447-1457. (doi: 10.13031/trans.58.11138) @2015
Authors: David J. Lyons, Paul H. Heinemann, James R. Schupp, Tara A. Baugher, Jude Liu
Keywords: Heuristic algorithms, Orchard automation, Peach production mechanization, Robotics, Selective fruit thinning.
Abstract. The objective of this investigation was to develop and test an automated selective fruit-thinning system for blossom removal in peach tree orchards. The proposed system needed to visualize the tree fruit canopy, discriminate targets (blossoms), mechanically reach the canopy from a stable platform, and remove unwanted targets. The system consisted of kinematic targeting and heuristic programming, a robotic arm, and a pomologically designed end-effector. A quarter-scale robotic arm based on a Fanuc M-16iL manipulator model and rotating brush end-effector were designed and constructed for this study. The normal and tangential force requirements to remove a peach blossom from a shoot were also evaluated. The resultant blossom force tests yielded a range of 0.44 to 0.57 N for the normal force and 0.49 to 0.71 N for the tangential force. The precision and accuracy of the robotic arm and end-effector placement were then examined. A kinematic positioning test for the robotic arm consisting of 120 repetitions fell within the first standard deviation of a proposed ±2.54 cm precision standard. With a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of ±8.96%, the robotic arm had a consistent range of -1.26 cm to +1.57 cm vector magnitude per target location. For the end-effector positioning test, the brushes reached the proposed ±2.54 cm target area 100% of the time. The deviation from the target to the center of the brushes was within the first standard deviation with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of ±10.33%, and the end-effector brushes had a consistent range of -2.97 cm to +3.04 cm per target location. The selective spatial thinning heuristic algorithm was also tested. The heuristic test consisted of a series of branches that varied in length from 10, 15, and 20 cm spanwise across the branch, with three artificial blossoms placed every 5 cm. The end-effector successfully removed the unwanted blossom in each case.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)