Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Purification effect of industrialized turtle-breeding wastewater using an improved celery ecological floating-bed system
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Paper number 131595782, 2013 Kansas City, Missouri, July 21 - July 24, 2013. (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aim.20131595782) @2013
Authors: Kun Xiang, Songming Zhu, Kuoqiu Yan, Chongjun Chen, Zhiying Han, Rongjin Zheng
Keywords: Intermittent aeration; Circulating water flow; Industrialized turtle-breeding wastewater; Ecological floating-bed system; Celery
Abstract. Direct discharge of industrialized turtle-breeding wastewater may cause serious water pollution. This paper investigated the purification effect of industrialized turtle-breeding wastewater using an improved celery ecological floating-bed system with circulating water flow and intermittent aeration in the glass greenhouse. The results showed that the system with intermittent aeration had a removal efficiency of 99.5%, 98.2%, 88.6% and 84.6% for ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP), respectively. For circulating water flow, the removal efficiency was 97.2%, 95.5%, 73.9% and 74.9%, respectively. The accumulation of total phosphorus and total nitrogen in celery body for intermittent aeration were 0.2 and 1.03 mg·d-1 per plant, while 0.098 and 0.9 mg·d-1 per plant for circulating water flow. The purification rate of NH4+-N, COD, TN and TP was 0.98, 4.77, 0.996 and 0.094 mg· L-1·m-2·d-1 for intermittent aeration, and 0.21, 1.55, 0.29 and 0.031 mg·L-1·m-2·d-1 for circulating water flow, respectively. It was indicated that, for purifying industrialized turtle-breeding wastewater, the celery ecological floating-bed system was quite efficient and relatively inexpensive, and the intermittent aeration was better than circulating water flow and more energy saving.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)