Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Technical Note: Assessing Best Management Practices Effectiveness at the Watershed Scale
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 27(6): 925-931. (doi: 10.13031/2013.40632) @2011
Authors: G. G. Ice
Keywords: BMPs, Biological, Effectiveness, Forestry, Physical, Water quality
Best Management Practices (BMPs) are commonly used to address water quality concerns from nonpoint source activities. BMPs must be effective to reduce impacts to acceptable levels at a watershed scale, but there is controversy about how to represent BMP effectiveness. The most common way is by calculating a percent reduction in pollutant load, but some criticize this as potentially misleading. Percent reduction is a legitimate and relatively easy to understand method of describing effectiveness, but it is only one of many ways. Other approaches include attainment of water quality or habitat standards and goals, biological response, and even economic efficiency. Perhaps the three biggest challenges for assessing BMPs directed at nonpoint source activities are defining appropriate water quality expectations (how much is enough and what is attainable), determining what site conditions limit BMP effectiveness, and determining specific watershed metrics and appropriate spatial and temporal scales for assessment. Ongoing efforts to develop beneficial and realistic numeric nutrient criteria and contemporary forest watershed studies, both using monitoring of multiple response parameters, provide examples of how weight-of-evidence approaches may be the most useful way to judge BMP effectiveness.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)