Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Side by Side Evaluation of Four Level Spreader–Vegetated Filter Strips and a Swale in Eastern North Carolina
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: 2011 Louisville, Kentucky, August 7-10, 2011 1110923.(doi:10.13031/2013.37365)
Authors: Erica M Petre, William F Hunt, Ryan J Winston
Keywords: Level spreader, Vegetated Filter Strip, Stormwater, Event Mean Concentration, Best Management Practice, Stormwater Control Measure, sediment, nutrients
Level spreader-vegetated filter strips (LS-VFS) are versatile, low cost stormwater control measures with high community acceptance in urban settings. Their effectiveness has not been well studied, however, in eastern North Carolina. Four LS-VFSs and a swale in Wilson, North Carolina were evaluated to determine their pollutant removal efficiencies. Two VFSs of 8 m x 6 m and two VFSs of 20 m x 6 m were constructed. One VFS of each size was amended with ViroPhosTM, a specialized phosphorus sorptive aggregate provided by EnviRemed. Influent and effluent samples were collected over a ten-month period and analyzed for nitrogen, phosphorus, and total suspended solids (TSS) concentrations. The data was analyzed to determine the effects of VFS size and soil amendment in an urban, eastern North Carolina setting. Total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were significantly reduced in each of the amended treatments and the swale. TN was found to be irreducible when influent concentrations were less than 1 mg/l. TP concentrations significantly increased through the unamended VFSs, most likely due to the low influent concentrations and the high P-Index of the native soils. TSS concentrations were significantly reduced by all treatments when influent concentrations were greater than 10 mg/l. Size did not have a significant effect on pollutant concentration reduction, however, the ViroPhos amendment had a significant effect on TN, TP, and TSS reduction (p<0.0001). The reduction in TN and TSS and the smaller increase in TP in the amended VFSs may have been due to physical settling within the VFS, in addition to any effect of the ViroPhos amendment.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)