ASABE Technical Library - Abstract
Member and Access Notice
Comparison of Silymarin Extraction from Silybum marianum Using a Soxhlet Apparatus, Batch Parr, and Countercurrent Pressurized Hot Water Reactors
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org
Citation: Transactions of the ASABE. 53(6): 1935-1940. (doi: 10.13031/2013.35793) @2010Authors: K. A. Bunnell, S. N. Wallace, E. C. Clausen, W. R. Penney, D. J. Carrier
Keywords: Extraction, Pressurized hot water, Silymarin, Countercurrent extraction reactor, phytochemicals
The extraction of phytochemicals using pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) is promising because it is efficiently performed with an environmentally benign solvent, resulting in extracts that are devoid of organic solvent traces. For phytochemical extraction, PHWE is usually carried out with 110C to 180C water, which can unfortunately lead to product degradation. To reduce product degradation during PHWE, a countercurrent pressurized hot water reactor was designed, constructed and tested; the phytochemical system used to test the reactor was silymarin extracted from Silybum marianum (milk thistle) seed meal. Silymarin yields and product degradation from the countercurrent reactor were compared to ethanol-Soxhlet and batch pressurized hot water extractions. The ethanol-Soxhlet extraction produced the cleanest high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) chromatogram (minimal by-product formation) and the largest silymarin yield at 18.3 mg per g seed meal. The countercurrent reactor yielded 5.2 mg silymarin per g seed meal, and the batch reactor yielded 6.2 mg silymarin per g seed meal. However, the countercurrent reactor did not produce the degradation peaks that were produced in the batch reactor. Thus, the countercurrent reactor offers possible technology for environmentally benign extraction of phytochemicals without product degradation.
(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)