|
Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. The Swan Creek Watershed management SystemPublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: TMDL 2010: Watershed Management to Improve Water Quality Proceedings, 14-17 November 2010 Hyatt Regency Baltimore on the Inner Harbor, Baltimore, Maryland USA 711P0710cd.(doi:10.13031/2013.35760)Authors: Glenn O’Neil, Lawrence Theller, Yi Shi, Jon Bartholic, Bernie Engel Keywords: KEYWORDS agricultural pollution, agricultural runoff, computer simulation, decision support, erosion, geographical information systems, GIS, hydrologic modeling, nitrogen, Ohio, phosphorus, sediment, watershed management The Institute of Water Research (IWR) at Michigan State University (MSU) and Purdue University built an on-line watershed management system that can aid in the development of strategies to address TMDLs. The Swan Creek Watershed Management System (http://www.iwr.msu.edu/swancreek) utilizes dynamic online modeling to allow users to evaluate the environmental impacts of different agricultural and urban best management practices (BMPs) within the northwestern Ohio watershed. The system is built on-top of already established water-quality/quantity modeling technologies, including Digital Watershed, L-THIA (Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment) and HIT (High Impact Targeting). Examples of the systems functionality include cost-benefit analyses of conservation tillages ability to reduce sediment run-off from farmland, and the impacts of urbanization on runoff volume and pollutant loading. Additionally, users can identify impaired waters, generate drainage basins around these locations, and view estimates of nutrient loads potentially causing the impairments. They can also digitize BMP and land-cover change scenarios on an on-line map to dynamically see what impact those practices may have on pollutant loading within that drainage basin. MSU and Purdue solicited and incorporated feedback from potential users in the systems design, including staff from local conservation districts, Ohio EPA, and watershed groups. With support from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MSU and Purdue are planning to expand the systems coverage to other Great Lakes watersheds; though, it could be implemented in other parts of the nation, including the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|