Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.

If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.


Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan

Citation:  Transactions of the ASAE.  VOL. 43(6): 1415-1419 . (doi: 10.13031/2013.3039) @2000
Authors:   R. K. Taylor, L. L. Bashford, M. D. Schrock
Keywords:   Tire properties, Vertical stiffness, Vibration

Vertical stiffness was measured for a 260/80R20 radial ply agricultural drive tire using five methods; load-deflection, non-rolling vertical free vibration, non-rolling equilibrium load-deflection, rolling vertical free vibration, and rolling equilibrium load-deflection. Tests were conducted at three inflation pressures (41, 83, and 124 kPa). Non-rolling free vibration resulted in the highest stiffness for all inflation pressures. Load-deflection and non-rolling equilibrium load-deflection results were similar at all inflation pressures. Rolling vertical free vibration and rolling equilibrium load-deflection results were similar at inflation pressures of 83 and 124 kPa. Non-rolling free vibration is not an adequate method for determining vertical tire stiffness when the tire is represented by a spring and viscous damper in parallel. The discrepancy between load-deflection and free vibration test results was attributed to hysteresis in the tire. Tire properties should be measured at the desired forward velocity when the tire is modeled as a spring and viscous damper in parallel.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)