Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

Effects of Stocking Density and Group Size on Thermoregulatory Responses of Laying Hens under Heat-Challenging Conditions

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Transactions of the ASABE. 52(6): 2033-2038. (doi: 10.13031/2013.29205) @2009
Authors:   A. R. Green, H. Xin
Keywords:   Caged layer, Core body temperature, Heat stress, Production, Welfare

Sectors of the U.S. cage layer industry have begun adopting practices of reduced stocking density (i.e., increased cage floor space per hen) and varying group sizes. This study was conducted with 24 groups of 48 W-36 laying hens (39 to 46 weeks old) to assess the effects of cage floor space or stocking density (SD) (348, 387, 465, or 581 cm2 hen-1; 54, 60, 72, or 90 in.2 hen-1) and group size (GS) (8 or 16 hens per cage) on the ability of the hens to cope with heat challenge. Data were collected at thermoneutral (24C or 76F) and warm conditions (32C or 90F, followed by 35C or 95F). No differences in core body temperature (CBT) of the hens were observed among the treatment regimens at 24C. In general, mean CBT increased with heat exposure duration (P < 0.0001) but leveled off after the 32C phase. At 32C, CBT was higher for GS of 16 vs. 8 (42.3C vs. 42.1C, P = 0.05) and higher for SD of 348 and 387 cm2 hen-1 than for 465 or 581 cm2 hen-1 (42.4C and 42.2C vs. 41.9C and 42.1C, respectively, P = 0.009). Bird body mass decreased as heat exposure duration increased (P < 0.0001), but no differences were observed among the treatments. No mortalities were observed during the thermoneutrality period, and the mortality rate increased with heat exposure duration. The results indicate that, while CBT was lower for lower SD, the increased space was not sufficient to offer a clear benefit for coping with heat challenge of 32C followed by 35C.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)