Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.

If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

Evaluation of a Flux Chamber for Assessing Gaseous Emissions and Treatment Effects of Poultry Manure

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan

Citation:  2009 Reno, Nevada, June 21 - June 24, 2009  096362.(doi:10.13031/2013.27355)
Authors:   Ricardo Rafael Acevedo, Hong - Li, Hongwei - Xin, Stacey Ann Roberts
Keywords:   Ammonia emission, flux chamber, mobile air emissions monitoring unit, emission mitigation

The need to quantify air emissions from animal feeding operations (AFOs) with relative ease and reasonable certainty continues to rise. Exploration of practical means to reduce air emissions also calls for less sophisticated but reasonably dependable methods to quantify the treatment effect. Although mobile air emissions monitoring units (MAEMUs) capable of precise and real-time emission measurement is the norm for continuous, intensive monitoring of emissions from mechanically ventilated animal facilities, their relative immobility and high cost are limiting the widespread use. Several other methods, such as gas-washing, micro-meteorological, wind tunnel, flux chamber, and mass-balance methods, have been employed to accommodate different measurement needs. Flux chambers have the advantages of being portable, small size, low cost, and less labor requirement. The objectives of this study were: (1) to develop a portable emission flux chamber system (EFC) for in-situ measurement of ammonia (NH3) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from manure; (2) to assess gaseous (NH3 and CO2) emissions of high-rise layer houses with the EFC vs. MAEMU; and (3) to evaluate the adequacy of using the EFC to determine the effects of dietary regimens on ammonia emissions from the layer manure. The preliminary data showed that NH3 emission from the manure surface measured with the EFC was 8% to 16% that of the whole barn measured with the MAEMU, while CO2 emission from the manure surface was 1% to 4% of the barn emission. The preliminary results obtained with EFC concerning the dietary efficacy of ammonia emission reduction were mixed as compared to those obtained with the MAEMU. More evaluation is continuing.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)