Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Field Comparison of PM10 Samplers
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Paper number MC08-109, 2005 Special Meeting Papers. (doi: 10.13031/2013.25257) @2008
Authors: Li Guo, Ronaldo G Maghirang, Edna B Razote, Jasper G Tallada, Joseph P Harner III, William L Hargrove
Keywords: PM10 mass concentration; High-volume sampler; Low-volume sampler; TEOM; Cattle feedlot
Fugitive emissions of PM10 (particulate matter with equivalent aerodynamic diameter of 10 m or less) are an increasing concern for concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO), including open-lot beef cattle feedlots. Various federal reference method (FRM) and equivalent samplers can be used to measure PM10 concentrations. This research compared the performance of Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM), FRM high-volume (HV), and low-volume (LV) PM10 samplers in measuring PM10 concentrations in the vicinity of large cattle feedlots in Kansas. Each of the three samplers was installed at the downwind and upwind perimeters of two commercial cattle feedlots (KS1 and KS2). Samplers were operated from May 2006 to February 2008 at KS1 and from February 2007 to February 2008 at KS2. PM10 concentration ranged from < 10 to 804 g m-3 at KS1 and from < 10 to 589 g m-3 at KS2. Comparison of collocated PM10 samplers showed that measured PM10 concentration was generally largest with the TEOM PM10 sampler and smallest with the LV PM10 sampler. Differences in PM10 concentration among samplers were affected by location and duration of sampling, season, and weather conditions.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)