Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Uncertainty Consideration in Watershed Scale Models
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: 21st Century Watershed Technology: Improving Water Quality and Environment Conference Proceedings, 29 March - 3 April 2008, Concepcion, Chile 701P0208cd.(doi:10.13031/2013.24311)
Authors: Adel Shirmohammadi, Aisha M Sexton, Hubert Montas, Ali M Sadeghi
Keywords: Key Words: Watershed Modeling, hydrology, Uncertainty, TMDL, nutrient reduction
ABSTRACT: Watershed scale hydrologic and water quality models have been used with increasing frequency to devise alternative pollution control strategies. With recent reenactment of the 1972 Clean Water Acts TMDL (total maximum daily load) componenet, some of the watershed scale models are being recommended for TMDL assessments on watershed scale. However, it has been recognized that such models may have a large degree of uncertainty associated with their simulations, and that this uncertainty can significantly limit the utility of their output. This study uses two uncertainty methods in assessing the uncertainty in SWAT models output due to variability in input parameter values in a small watershed (Warner Creek Watershed) located in northern Maryland. Both Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) with constrained Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) technique and Mean Value First Order Reliability Method (MFORM) were utilized. Additionally, results obtained with MFORM were used to evaluate the margin of safety (MOS) in the TMDL assessment for the selected watershed. Results showed that using average parameter values for the watershed without considering their variability, may result in significant uncertainty in SWATs simulated streamflow, sediment, and nitrate-nitrogen. Results also indicated the capability of MFORM in capturing the uncertainty in SWATs simulations and identifying the most sensitive parameters. In addition, results of MFORM were successfully used to identify nutrient reduction rates that are necessary to meet watershed TMDL criteria with acceptable level of confidence. This study concluded that using a best possible distribution for the input parameters is much preferred over using an average value.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)