Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

Comparison of Dispersion Models for Ammonia Emissions from a Ground-Level Area Source

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Transactions of the ASABE. 50(6): 2189-2197. (doi: 10.13031/2013.24094) @2007
Authors:   W. B. Faulkner, J. J. Powell, J. M. Lange, B. W. Shaw, R. E. Lacey, C. B. Parnell
Keywords:   AERMOD, AUSTAL, Dispersion model, Gaussian, ISCST3, Lagrangian stochastic, WindTrax

Dispersion models are important tools for determining and regulating pollutant emissions from many sources, including ground-level area sources such as feedyards, dairies, and agricultural field operations. This study compares the calculated emission fluxes of ammonia from a feedyard in the Texas panhandle using four dispersion models: Industrial Source Complex Short Term Version 3 (ISCST3), AERMOD-PRIME, WindTrax, and AUSTAL. ISCST3 and AERMOD are Gaussian plume models, while WindTrax and AUSTAL are backward and forward Lagrangian stochastic models, respectively. Identical measured downwind ammonia concentration data were entered into each model. The results of this study indicate that calculated emission rates and/or emission factors are model specific, and no simple conversion factor can be used to adjust emission rates and/or factors between models. Therefore, emission factors developed using one model should not be used in other models to determine downwind pollutant concentrations.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)