Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Economic Analysis of two Receiving Facility Designs for a Bioenergy Plant
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: 2007 ASAE Annual Meeting 076051.(doi:10.13031/2013.23308)
Authors: John S Cundiff, Robert D Grisso, Hosein Shapouri
Keywords: Biomass, round bale, hauling cost, receiving facility, switchgrass
Two options for receiving round bales at a bioenergy plant were compared to the existing wood chip system. Option 1 envisions that round bales will be loaded into 16-bale shipping frames and delivered to the plant for size reduction. Option 2 envisions that the bales will be chopped at satellite storage locations and blown into 6.1-m dry freight ISO containers, a system that emulates the wood chip system. Delivered cost(farmgate + hauling/receiving) was $79.30/dry Mg for Option 1, 72.20 for Option 2, and 44.35 for the wood chip system. The wood chip cost has no production cost(payment to land owner) or storage cost. Round bales are a cleaner, more homogeneous, and lower moisture content feedstock, thus they are a higher value feedstock.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)