Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.

If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program, established by U.S. federal law, drives US water quality policy/management today. Mathematical models, in combination with field monitoring data, are widely used when developing TMDLs since they can potentially save time, reduce cost, and minimize the need for experimentally evaluating management alternatives. This paper introduces the collective effort of a multidisciplinary panel of experts to evaluate the current status of TMDL modeling technology available for the most common waterbody impairment factors, along with issues of proper model use, uncertainty of modeling results, and economic tools to optimize the selection and application of these tools for TMDL development. Each of these topics is developed in individual papers within this collection. The review indicates that the status of TMDL modeling tools for the most common stream impairments is inconsistent. Research must continue to advance our understanding of many of the processes leading to stream impairment, and to address many of the existing model limitations. Reviews of case studies within this collection of papers show that users must be better trained to improve the application of TMDL models. In some cases, lack of adequate data sets limits model development and application. Existing computer models are considered capable of simulating sediment and nutrients, lacking for dissolved oxygen, and grossly insufficient for biological indicators. Quantification of modeling uncertainty and communication to end users as well as economic optimization of the results are suggested as indispensable components to improve the success of the TMDL program. (Full paper published in Trans. of ASABE 49(4):961-965)