Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. Analysis of selection effect based on Kappa Casein gene on milk yield production of Iranian Sarabi cattle breed using stochastic simulationPublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, 4th World Congress Conference, Proceedings of the 24-26 July 2006 (Orlando, Florida USA) Publication Date 24 July 2006 701P0606.(doi:10.13031/2013.21976)Authors: Zakizadeh, S., A. Jahan Bakhshi, A. Nejati-Javaremi, M. Reissmann, G. Rahimi-Mianji Keywords: simulation, kappa casein, PCR-RFLP, phenotypic assisted selection, genotypic assisted selection PCR-RFLP was used to genotype 87 animals of Iranian Sarabi cattle for A and B alleles of kappa casein gene. A 350 bp length of exon 4 and intron 4 was amplified and digested with HinfI endonuclease. Samples were loaded on agarose gel (2%) and genotypes under UV light. Allele frequency of desirable B allele was 0.57. Also, stochastic simulation was used to generate milk yield trait for a population with 4950 females and 50 males for 15 overlapping generations. Population parameters included 1100 kg and 436 kg for average milk yield and phenotypic deviation, respectively; and 0.27 for heritability. Additive and dominance effects of Kappa Casein gene were considered as 187.63 kg and 50.37 kg, respectively. Two methods were considered for selection of males based on the first phenotypic record of their dams (PAS) or molecular information of each male, individually (GAS). Females were always selected on their first phenotypic record. Although, there was a significant difference between polygenic and major gene genetic response between two methods, after the 5th generations, but there was no significant difference for the sum of polygenic and major gene response. After 15 generations of selection there was no significant difference between inbreeding coefficient between two methods. Selection plan for males based on one single major gene had no advantage over the conventional selection based on dam record in native Sarabi breed. (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|