Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Influence of Preferential Flow on Surface Runoff Fluxes
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Pp. 205-208 in Preferential Flow, Water Movement and Chemical Transport in the Environment, Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. (3-5 January 2001, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA), eds. D. D. Bosch and K. W. King. St. Joseph, Michigan: ASAE 701P0006.(doi:10.13031/2013.2103)
Authors: T.J. Gish, W.P. Dulaney, C.S.T. Daughtry, and K.-J.S. Kung
Keywords: funnel flow, seepage zones, environment, watershed, nitrate transport
Determining the interaction between surface runoff and subsurface hydrology has been hindered by our inability to characterize the subsurface stratigraphy on a watershed scale. Over 40 km of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data were collected and evaluated in determining subsurface stratigraphy and flow patterns on a 20 ha research site in Beltsville, Maryland. The research site has four watersheds with a confining clay lens that varies in depth between 0.9 m and 3.5 m from the soil surface. The watersheds have similar textures, organic matter content, as determined with over 1,700 soil cores. Yield distributions were also similar. Although the surface slope was greater on one of the watersheds, slope alone could not explain why it also had a nitrate runoff flux that was 18 times greater than the other watersheds. GPR data revealed that this watershed had subsurface flow patterns that allowed seepage zones to exist. This study demonstrates the impact subsurface stratigraphy can have on surface chemical runoff fluxes.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)