Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

Laboratory Evaluation of Abatement Measures for Mitigating Dust Emission from Cattle Feedlots

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Paper number  054008,  2005 ASAE Annual Meeting . (doi: 10.13031/2013.19831) @2005
Authors:   E.B. Razote, R.G. Maghirang, J.P. Murphy, B.W. Auvermann, J.P. Harner III, T.V. Pjesky, W.L. Hargrove
Keywords:   Cattle feedyard, PM10 emission, dust control

Measures for mitigating dust emission from cattle feedlots were evaluated by using a laboratory chamber. The chamber, which has a cross section of 0.61 m x 0.61 m and a length of 3.7 m, has a layer of dry, loose, sieved feedlot manure above a compacted soil. The vertical movement of a cattle hoof was simulated by dropping a 4.5-kg steel weight onto the manure surface. Highvolume samplers for PM10 (particulate matter smaller than 10-m aerodynamic equivalent diameter) were used to collect suspended PM10. The applications of wheat straw, sawdust (242, 484, 726 g/m2), and surface water (3.2 and 6.4 mm) on dust emission were investigated by using a 10-cm manure depth and 54-J drop energy of the steel weight. Results indicated that addition of wheat straw, sawdust, or water to the manure surface significantly decreased PM10 emission potential.

The addition of magnesium chloride and an organic-based substance on the manure surface to control PM10 emission potential was also investigated and compared with surface water application; a manure depth of 10 cm, wet layer of 6.4 mm, and drop energy of 27 J were used. Surface applications of magnesium chloride and water did not result in any significant difference in PM10 emission potential. As the wet layer dried up, however, emission potential was significantly greater from the manure surface treated with magnesium chloride than from the water treatment. The manure treated with the organic-based substance had slightly greater emission potential immediately after application than did manure treated with magnesium chloride and water; but manure treated with the organic-based substance had the least emission potential during subsequent tests.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)