Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
An Approach for Estimating Water Quality Benefits of Conservation Practices at the National Level
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Paper number 052043, 2005 ASAE Annual Meeting . (doi: 10.13031/2013.18901) @2005
Authors: C. Santhi, N. Kannan, M. Di Luzio, S. R. Potter, Jeffrey G. Arnold, Jay D. Atwood, R. L. Kellogg
Keywords: Soil and Water Assessment Tool, Agricultural Environmental Productivity Extender, Conservation Practices, Water Quality, National Assessment, HUMUS
The United States Department of Agriculture has initiated the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) to quantify the environmental benefits of conservation practices at the national scale. This paper provides an overview of the analytical approach being used in the CEAP national assessment to estimate off-site water quality benefits. For the assessment, a sampling and modeling approach is used. The farm-scale model Agricultural Policy/Environmental EXtender (APEX) is used to simulate conservation practices for cultivated cropland. Farmer surveys conducted on a subset of National Resource Inventory sample points provide information on current farming activities and conservation practices for APEX. Output from APEX will be input into the watershed scale model, Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in the HUMUS (Hydrologic Unit Modeling for the United States) system for routing the pollutants to the 8-digit watershed outlet. SWAT will be calibrated and validated using the United States Geological Surveys SPAtially Referenced Regressions On Watershed attributes (SPARROW) model output, streamflow and pollutant data. The HUMUS system simulates in-stream effects for (a) a baseline scenario with conservation practices and (b) an alternative scenario without conservation practices. The off-site water quality benefits of conservation practices currently in use will be determined by comparing outputs for the alternative scenario to the baseline outputs at each 8-digit watershed. Benefits will be reported as reductions in in-stream concentrations and loadings of sediment, nutrients and pesticides, and reductions in the number of days that concentrations exceed human health and ecological thresholds.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)