|
Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version. If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options. Comparison of Five Models to Scale Daily Evapotranspiration from One-Time-of-Day MeasurementsPublished by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org Citation: Paper number 052002, 2005 ASAE Annual Meeting . (doi: 10.13031/2013.18885) @2005Authors: P. D. Colaizzi, S. R. Evett, T. A. Howell, J. A. Tolk Keywords: remote sensing, energy balance, lysimeters, water management, evapotranspiration Calculation of regional, spatially distributed evapotranspiration (ET) is possible using remotely sensed surface temperatures from sensors aboard air or space platforms. These platforms provide instantaneous data at frequencies of days to weeks, so that instantaneous latent heat flux can be computed from energy balance algorithms. However, instantaneous latent heat flux must be converted to ET and then scaled to daily (24-h) totals for most practical applications. We compared five scaling models where a single measurement of 0.5-h ET was used to estimate the daily total. Each model takes advantage of the quasi-sinusoidal nature of daytime ET and other daytime parameters including solar radiation, available energy, or reference ET. The surfaces were fully irrigated alfalfa, partially irrigated cotton, dryland grain sorghum, and bare soil (tilled fallow sorghum). Actual ET was measured by precision weighing lysimeters. For cropped surfaces, the models based on grass reference ET resulted in the best agreement between observed and predicted daily ET totals. For bare soil, the model based on available energy (i.e., evaporative fraction) resulted in the best agreement. Relative error between observed and predicted daily ET increased as daily ET decreased. Observed and predicted daily ET agreed well for the transpiring crops (RMSE of 0.33 to 0.46 mm d-1 for mean daily ET of 3.9 to 5.8 mm d-1) but poorly for bare soil (RMSE of 0.47 mm d-1 for mean daily ET of 1.4 mm d-1). (Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)
|