Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

When Do Cotton Yield Monitors Pay?

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Paper number  051130,  2005 ASAE Annual Meeting . (doi: 10.13031/2013.18868) @2005
Authors:   Burton C. English, James A. Larson, Roland K. Roberts, Rebecca L. Cochran
Keywords:   Cotton Yield Monitor, Precision Farming, Economic Feasibility

The Cotton Yield Monitor Investment Decision Aid (CYMIDA) utilizes partial budgeting and breakeven techniques to evaluate the potential costs and benefits of a cotton yield monitoring information system. CYMIDA has the following features: 1) a printable users guide, 2) easy point and click operation, 3) default yield monitor purchase costs to serve as a starting point for the user, and 4) sensitivity analysis for changes in both cotton and input prices. CYMIDA calculates annual and per-acre cotton yield monitor ownership costs based on crop acreage, harvest capacity, and yield monitor purchase costs. CYMIDA gives producers a risk-free opportunity to evaluate the lint yield gains and input cost savings needed to pay for a yield monitoring information system before actually investing in the technology. Required yield gains and input savings to pay for investment in the information system can be evaluated for the following crop input decisions: seed, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, lime, growth regulators, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, harvest aids, and drainage. In 2002, CYMIDA was simply a spreadsheet now it is a user friendly program.

Research was conducted to evaluate the breakeven yield gains and input savings required to cover the cost of investment in a precision farming system for gathering site-specific information and applying crop inputs using that information and variable rate technology. Results indicate that investment in the system is more economically feasible for larger cotton farms because costs can be spread over more cotton acreage. Allocating some of the ownership costs for certain equipment to other crops improves the relative profitability of the precision farming system for cotton.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)