Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.

If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.


Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan

Citation:  Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and Emerging TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Proceedings of the Third Conference 5-9 March 2005 (Atlanta, Georgia USA) Publication Date 5 March 2005  701P0105.(doi:10.13031/2013.18092)
Authors:   V. Nangia, P. Gowda, D. Mulla, G. Sands
Keywords:   Water quality, ADAPT, GIS, fertilizer management, tile drainage

This paper evaluates the effectiveness of alternative agronomic practices at improving water quality in agricultural fields. A spatial process model was calibrated using monthly flow and NO3-N losses from a 14 ha commercial farm in southeastern Minnesota. The study area was monitored for NO3-N losses from 1999-2003. Spatial patterns in crops, topography, fertilizer applications and climate were used as input to drive the model. Monitoring data from 1999-2001 were used for calibration and data from 2002-2003 were used in validation of the model. For the calibration period, the observed and predicted flow and NO3-N discharges were in good agreement with r2 values of 0.86 and 0.86, respectively. During validation, the observed and predicted flow and NO3-N discharges were in excellent agreement with r2 values of 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. The calibrated model was used to evaluate the effects of rate and timing of N fertilizer application on NO3-N losses. Reductions in NO3-N losses are possible by changing the application timing from fall to spring. For an application rate of 180 kg/ha (160 lb/ac), there was an 8% reduction in NO3-N losses when switching from a fall to spring application. Further reductions in NO3-N losses require reductions in N application rates. A twelve percent reduction in nitrate losses was found when the application rate was reduced from 180 kg/ha (160 lb/ac) to 135 kg/ha (120 lb/ac)

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)