Click on the underlined title to access the document or go back to the Search Results screen to download the PDF version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Dynamic Testing of GPS Receivers
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Paper number 031013, 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting . (doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/lnv2003.2013)
Authors: Randal K. Taylor, Mark D. Schrock, John Bloomfield, Ganesh Bora, Gary Brockmeier, Wally Burton, Brandon Carlson, Joshua Gattis, Ross Groening, Jim Kopriva, Nathan Oleen, Jessica Ney, Chad Simmelink, a
Keywords: GPS Accuracy, standards, vehicle guidance
The popularity of GPS-based guidance systems for agriculture is increasing. However, no dynamic test standards are available to evaluate these receivers. In April 2002, GPS receivers were dynamically tested on a 0.8 km length of railroad track using a small rail cart. The track was surveyed with an RTK GPS receiver and referenced to a NGS benchmark. The GPS receivers were evaluated over a 24-hr period. The tests were conducted in both directions and at 2 different speeds. Cross-track and pass-to-pass errors were determined for a John Deere StarFire receiver with a dual frequency correction and a Trimble AgGPS132 in the autonomous mode. Cross-track errors were sequentially correlated creating problems for using typical statistical analysis methods. A Voronoi step interpolation method was used to generate evenly spaced data for Fourier analysis. Fourier analysis indicated that the cross-track errors contained significant periodic structure below 4 cycles per day. This implies that cross-track accuracy tests should be conducted for a minimum of 12-hr durations. Fourier analysis indicated that pass-to-pass errors were more random than cross-track errors, with no clear concentrations of frequency content, implying that pass-to-pass accuracy tests can yield meaningful results in less time than required for cross-track accuracy testing.