Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Soil Moisture Regimes of Three Conservation Tillage Systems
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Transactions of the ASAE. 27 (5): 1385-1390. (doi: 10.13031/2013.32975) @1984
Authors: M. D. Johnson, B. Lowery, T. C. Daniel
ABSTRACT COMPARISON of three conservation tillage systems, chisel plowing (CH), till-plant (TP) and no-till (NT), to conventional moldboard plowing (CN) indicates soil moisture advantages with conservation tillage vary. Volumetric water content (3-year average, 0-76 mm depth) at planting was 0.324, 0.279, 0.267 and 0.246 m^m-^ for NT, CH, TP, and CN, respectively. Average 3-year water content in the 0-0.25 m zone for weekly measurements during the growing season was 0.320, 0.309, 0.300, and 0.297 m^m^ for NT, CH, CN and TP, respectively. Soil moisture was higher in the NT treatment during most of the growing period. However, during a heavy rain period (93 mm), profile recharge in the CN, TP and NT treatments was 34, 34 and 44% less than for the CH treatment, respectively. Less water was removed from the 0.50-1.0 m zone of NT during extensive water depletion. For this soil with a 6-% slope, the NT treatment displayed the least water fluctuation during drying periods.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)