Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.


If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.

Simulation of Methane Emissions from Dairy Farms to Assess Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies

Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org

Citation:  Transactions of the ASABE. 52(4): 1313-1323. (doi: 10.13031/2013.27781) @2009
Authors:   D. S. Chianese, C. A. Rotz, T. L. Richard
Keywords:   Dairy farm, Greenhouse gas, Methane, Simulation model

As a sector, agriculture is reported to be the second greatest contributor to atmospheric methane (CH4) in the U.S., emitting 31% of the total emission. Primary sources of CH4 on dairy farms are the animals and manure storage, with smaller contributions from field-applied manure, feces deposited by grazing animals, and manure on barn floors. The Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) was expanded to include simulation of CH4 emissions from all farm sources along with modules predicting other greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The new CH4 module incorporated previously published relationships and experimental data that were consistent with our modeling objectives and the current structure of IFSM. When used to simulate previously reported experiments, the model was found to predict enteric fermentation and slurry manure storage emissions similar to those measured. In simulating a representative 100-cow dairy farm in Pennsylvania, the model predicted a total average annual emission of 21 Mg CH4. This included annual emissions of 142 kg CH4 per cow from the Holstein herd and 6.4 kg CH4 per m3 of slurry manure in storage, which were consistent with previously summarized emission data. To illustrate the use of the expanded whole-farm model, potential CH4 reduction strategies were evaluated. Farm simulations showed that increasing the production and use of forage (corn silage) in animal diets increased CH4 emission by 16% with little impact on the global warming potential of the net farm emission of all GHGs. Use of grazing along with high forage diets reduced net farm GHG emission by 16%. Using an enclosed manure storage and burning the captured biogas reduced farm emission of CH4 by 32% with a 24% reduction in the net farm emission of GHG. Incorporation of GHG emission modules in IFSM provides a tool for estimating whole-farm emissions of CH4 and evaluating proposed reduction strategies along with their impact on net GHG emission and other environmental and economic measures.

(Download PDF)    (Export to EndNotes)