If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Use of eddy-covariance methods to “calibrate” simple estimators of evapotranspiration
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org
Citation: 2017 ASABE Annual International Meeting 1700912.(doi:10.13031/aim.201700912)
Authors: David M. Sumner, Jeffrey S. Geurink, Amy Swancar
Keywords: Evapotranspiration, eddy covariance, humid subtropical, potential evapotranspiration, unimproved pasture, west-central Florida.
Abstract. Direct measurement of actual evapotranspiration (ET) provides quantification of this large component of the hydrologic budget, but typically requires long periods of record and large instrumentation and labor costs. Simple surrogate methods of estimating ET, if â€œcalibratedâ€ to direct measurements of ET, provide a reliable means to quantify ET. Eddy-covariance measurements of ET were made for 12 years (2004-2015) at an unimproved bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pasture in Florida. These measurements were compared to annual rainfall derived from rain gage data and monthly potential ET (PET) obtained from a long-term (since 1995) U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) statewide, 2-kilometer, daily PET product. The annual proportion of ET to rainfall indicates a strong correlation (r2=0.86) to annual rainfall; the ratio increases linearly with decreasing rainfall. Monthly ET rates correlated closely (r2=0.84) to the USGS PET product. The results indicate that simple surrogate methods of estimating actual ET show positive potential in the humid Florida climate given the ready availability of historical rainfall and PET.