Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Subirrigation System Performance and Evaluation in the Red River Valley of the North
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.org
Citation: 2016 10th International Drainage Symposium Conference, 6-9 September 2016, Minneapolis, Minnesota .(doi:10.13031/IDS.20162493648)
Authors: Xinhua Jia, Thomas F. Scherer, Dean D. Steele, Thomas M. DeSutter
Keywords: Subirrigation, water use efficiency, uniformity, Red River Valley of the North.
Abstract. Subirrigation (SI) applies water below the ground surface and raises the phreatic water to within or near the root zone by using a subsurface drainage system. It is relatively new to the Red River Valley (RRV) of the North in eastern North Dakota (ND) and west central Minnesota (MN). In 2011, two SI field sites in the RRV were installed and have shown promising results in optimal water management and increasing agricultural production. Unlike a surface irrigation system, SI supplies water below the ground surface over a long duration, water loss is generally through crop transpiration, and leads to negligible water loss via wind, surface runoff and evaporation. Therefore, a new method was developed to evaluate the SI system performance. Water application efficiency (Ea+ET) was calculated through the soil moisture changes in the root zone before and after the SI application plus the evapotranspiration (ET) with known amounts of SI, rainfall, and ET. Uniformity coefficient (UC) and distribution efficiency of low quarter (DULQ) were estimated from the total depth of water stored in the root zone. The SI system performance in 2014 and 2015 showed that the Ea was over 100% for the MN and ND 2014 site-years and 79% for the ND 2015 site-year. The Ea values were high, indicating that the SI system either performed better than typical surface irrigation systems with minimal water loss, or had measurement errors, such as inaccurate ET estimation or excluding the upward flux from the deeper soil. We may have to reformulate how Ea is calculated. The UCs and DULQs were lower than a typical sprinkler and surface irrigation systems, possibly due to its unique SI flow path. Overall, the evaluation indicated that a SI system is effective as a water supply, but the uniformity needs to be improved with a longer SI duration or smaller flow rate.
(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)