Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
A Survey of Seed Cotton Dryers in Cotton Gins in the Southwestern United States
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 28(1): 87-97. (doi: 10.13031/2013.41273) @2012
Authors: K. D. Baker, E. Hughs
Keywords: Energy, Cotton gin, Moisture content, Drying, Pressure drop, Airflow, Temperature control.
Seed cotton drying is an important and costly part of cotton ginning. Seed cotton having a moisture content above 7% cannot be cleaned or ginned properly. In this study, 73 dryers were surveyed by on-site visits in 23 gins located in the southwestern United States during the 2007 to 2010 ginning seasons. Drying systems surveyed included: standard tower, short tower, hot shelf, hi-volume tower, belt, big reel, vertical, hot air cleaner, pipe, cross-flow, hot box, hi-slip, jet, fountain, and collider systems. Forty-eight percent of dryers had the recommended dual temperature controls, while 26% had only a primary temperature control and 26% had only a maximum temperature control. Belt and big reel dryers had the lowest specific airflow rates (0.34 to 0.72 m3/kg of seed cotton) and also had the lowest energy in the conveying air (1.7 kJ/kg of lint or less). Collider, fountain, and hi-volume tower dryers had the highest specific airflow rates (1.9 to 2.8 m3/kg) and hi-slip, hi-volume tower, and standard tower dryers had the highest energy in the conveying air (7.7 kJ/kg or more). Belt, cross-flow, and hot air cleaner dryers had the lowest pressure drop across the dryer (0.5 kPa or less), while hi-slip, pipe, and standard tower dryers had the highest pressure drop (1.8 kPa or more). Fuel use was positively correlated with airflow (r=0.58) and temperature rise (r=0.59). Systems with fountain, collider, belt, big reel, jet, and hot air cleaner dryers had favorable, low values for fuel use (13.7 kJ/kg of lint or less), while systems with crossflow and hi-volume tower dryers had high values for fuel use (30.0 kJ/kg or more).(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)