Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
Impact of Land Application Method on Ammonia Loss from Hog Lagoon Effluent
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 25(6): 963-973. (doi: 10.13031/2013.29236) @2009
Authors: S. B. Shah, B. K. Balla, G. L. Grabow, P. W. Westerman, D. E. Bailey
Keywords: Drag-hose, Traveling gun, Acid scrubber, Integrated horizontal flux, Evaporation, Drift, Uncertainty analysis
Ammonia volatilization during land-application of hog lagoon effluent can adversely affect public health and the environment. Ammonia losses from hog lagoon effluent applied to Coastal Bermudagrass with the drag-hose (two applications) and traveling gun (three applications) were measured in spring and summer of 2006. Ammonia losses during application with the traveling gun were measured with acidified catch cans while losses during (traveling gun) or following (drag-hose) application for up to 96 h was measured with a micrometeorological method, the integrated horizontal flux (IHF) method; ammonia-N losses measured with the IHF method and catch cans are not additive. Ammonia-N losses during application with the traveling gun ranged between 3.8% to 9.2% of total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) applied, increasing with wind speed and decreasing relative humidity. For two applications, average ammonia loss with the drag-hose was <25% of the traveling gun. Ammonia-N losses from the traveling gun and drag-hose averaged 46.3% (n = 3) and 5.5% (n = 2), respectively, of the TAN applied. Ammonia-N loss during the first 4 h, as percent of total TAN loss was higher with the traveling gun. Whereas traveling gun ammonia losses were affected more by weather (e.g., relative humidity) and crop height, drag-hose losses were impacted more by effluent properties. Wind speed measurement contributed to <6% uncertainty in ammonia loss for both systems during one 4-h period. There are also other sources of uncertainty. Results from this study are comparable with published micrometeorological studies on hog lagoon effluent application.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)