Click on “Download PDF” for the PDF version or on the title for the HTML version.
If you are not an ASABE member or if your employer has not arranged for access to the full-text, Click here for options.
ASSESS THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE AND WATERSHED IMPAIRMENT IN SOUTH CAROLINA-A GIS BASED SPATIAL APPROACH
Published by the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan www.asabe.orgCitation: Pp. 556-567 in the Ninth International Animal, Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes Proceedings of the 12-15 October 2003 Symposium (Research Triangle Park, North Carolina USA), Publication Date 12 October 2003. 701P1203.(doi:10.13031/2013.15294)
Authors: K. S. Lu and J. S. Allen
Keywords: Animal agriculture, watershed impairment, dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, phosphorus, pH impairment, spatial analysis, geographic information system, South Carolina
This research examined the relationship between animal agriculture and watershed impairment in South Carolina from a GIS-based spatial, empirical approach. Animal agriculture was represented by cattle, poultry and swine operations that were measured in terms of animal population, farms, facilities and units as well as their derived density variables. Watershed impairment was measured in terms of priority ranks for dissolved oxygen (DO), fecal coliform (FC) bacteria, phosphorus (P), and pH problems. The 11-digit hydrological units of watersheds were used as the units of analysis. Map overlay, spatial summarization, canonical correlation, multiple regression, and Pearson correlation were performed to determine how strong the relationships are, which animals have larger impacts, and where the problem areas are. The results indicate that there are only very weak, though statistically significant, associations between animal agriculture and watershed impairment in this state. FC bacteria are the most widely spread problem and cattle facilities appear to have slightly larger impacts on watershed quality than poultry farms do whereas swine do not aggravate the existing impairment. State policies on animal regulations and environmental standards should acknowledge these differences among impairment types, animal operations, and geographic regions. While cattle feeding operations should be targeted for further research and reduction of animal related pollution particularly in the identified problem areas, more resources should be used in the identification and control of non-animal agricultural sources that are the major causes of DO, FC, P and pH related impairment in the state of South Carolina.(Download PDF) (Export to EndNotes)